I know it's been more than a month since my last post, but this one had to take a considerable amount of research. Plus I'm lazier than a dying, half-awake sloth.
Many people who don't currently live in caves know of the small region we like to call "Palestine," which is technically Israel. Now, as many of you folks may know, "Palestine" is a little patch of Israel full of Arab squatters--I mean Palestinians--that believe they have the right to control Israel and that the Jews should be permanently expelled. They believe this so strongly they have the irritating tendency to send rockets into Jewish towns and send militants into these towns, where they murder entire families of innocent and defenseless people. Palestinians suffer from the delusion that they are treated as second-class citizens, and of course completely ignore that it is their leaders who are preventing the money from reaching the streets. The Palestinian leaders instead prefer to spend almost every penny they are given to from the UN on weapons and training from Syria, Iran, Egypt, and anywhere else jam-packed with Muslim fanatics.
What many of these people don't know is that they are not victims of Israeli oppression at all. Instead, they are in fact victims of their own neighbors' neglect. When the Arabs intended to destroy Israel shortly after it was created in the late '40s, they ordered the Israeli Muslims to leave the small Jewish Island in that sea of turbans and AK-47s. In return, they were promised the land left behind by the Israelis after they were forced out of the country. Unfortunately for the Arabs, the Israelis had more than half a brain and, with relative ease, forced Jordan, Lebanon, Syria, and Egypt out of its borders. Stumbling around and wondering what the hell had just happened, the Arabs set up refugee camps the size of small cities, blaming the Israelis for their failure and claiming that the Jews had forced the Arabs out of Israel. They conveniently forgot that it was them who had gotten their people to leave so that an entire nation could be destroyed, and that it was the Arabs, not the Jews, who were the sole cause of the Palestinian expulsion from Israel.
My basic point is that the Palestinians and the Arabs in general are the main problem in that section of the Middle East. The Israelis are merely defending themselves: they didn't start the war, although they certainly are trying to end it peacefully and fairly. Think about it, folks.
Saturday, November 8, 2008
Monday, September 22, 2008
Guns don't kill people, illegal guns kill people
Well, folks, after another very long break from blogging, I'm back with another long, well-thought-out rant.
Now, I know the many people who go to my site are probably not Canadian, but I am about to speak on a Canucklehead issue that will someday effect their neighbors further south. Not long ago, in 2005, Prime Minister Paul Martin and his Liberal minions decided that, in order to curb gun violence, they would put a nation-wide ban on handguns in Canada. I'm not sure if this ban simply never materialized or if it was lifted by Stephen Harper, but I do know that it is extremely difficult to get a handgun or rifle in Canada.
The logic of this move escapes me. First of all, do they even think about the people who are committing all the gun crimes? Do they think that some nut-job gangster criminal is just going to waltz into some store and purchase his Colt .45 legally, having done all the paperwork and gone through all the legal documents? No! He gets his gun from arms dealers, other gangsters, and off of the corpses of his victims. Fact of the matter is that a gun ban won't actually stop the violence at all, it'll just make people think they're doing something about a problem they have no hope in hell of solving.
Second off, the gun ban would do far more harm than good. The reason why burglary is such a problem in Canada is because nobody can get a frickin' pistol to defend themselves with! A store owner, a home owner, or anything else can't resist an armed robbery because they haven't got anything to fight back with. So, while Canadians can only call the cops and hope the criminal doesn't get far before they arrive, the American can do this. Unless this madness is stopped, the people will eventually become totally defenseless to defend themselves from criminals and the police will be unable to stop the crime waves. Eventually, this may spread to the United States, violating the constitutional right to bear arms. Think about it, folks.
Now, I know the many people who go to my site are probably not Canadian, but I am about to speak on a Canucklehead issue that will someday effect their neighbors further south. Not long ago, in 2005, Prime Minister Paul Martin and his Liberal minions decided that, in order to curb gun violence, they would put a nation-wide ban on handguns in Canada. I'm not sure if this ban simply never materialized or if it was lifted by Stephen Harper, but I do know that it is extremely difficult to get a handgun or rifle in Canada.
The logic of this move escapes me. First of all, do they even think about the people who are committing all the gun crimes? Do they think that some nut-job gangster criminal is just going to waltz into some store and purchase his Colt .45 legally, having done all the paperwork and gone through all the legal documents? No! He gets his gun from arms dealers, other gangsters, and off of the corpses of his victims. Fact of the matter is that a gun ban won't actually stop the violence at all, it'll just make people think they're doing something about a problem they have no hope in hell of solving.
Second off, the gun ban would do far more harm than good. The reason why burglary is such a problem in Canada is because nobody can get a frickin' pistol to defend themselves with! A store owner, a home owner, or anything else can't resist an armed robbery because they haven't got anything to fight back with. So, while Canadians can only call the cops and hope the criminal doesn't get far before they arrive, the American can do this. Unless this madness is stopped, the people will eventually become totally defenseless to defend themselves from criminals and the police will be unable to stop the crime waves. Eventually, this may spread to the United States, violating the constitutional right to bear arms. Think about it, folks.
Thursday, August 14, 2008
Made in China
Well folks, I've been sitting on the fence about a blog on that war in South Ossetia and the Beijing Olympics, and since people seem to care more about some schmuck from Germany getting a gold medal than about some poor kid bombed by MiGs, I decided on the latter.
I was watching a program recently, and it was about the effect of the Olympics on the Chinese population. I gotta tell you, from what I can see, it's just about the worst atrocity committed on the Chinese people since those commie SOBs took power. (At least, the worst one that gets reported to the West). People were forced from their homes so they could build sections of the Olympic stadiums and ceremonial sites and so on that were needed. Civilians were basically told "get out of here or go to prison," were tossed out on the street, and were incapable of complaining to anybody about it because, guess what? In China, you've got no rights! If you complain about losing your house so some guy from the other side of the planet can run for a hundred meters or so, you go to jail! Individuals don't own their homes, the state does, so they get booted out of them for the enjoyment of people everywhere from Canada to Australia (going east, that is).
China has essentially destroyed the Olympics, and here's how. Instead of having real fireworks (which you'd think they'd be well-stocked with since they invented the damn things), they make ones using a computer-those aren't fireworks you're watching, they're binary code made into colorful shapes. And for the kid who sang that stupid little song for the opening ceremony, they made her lip synch, because the kid who actually sang it wasn't cute enough for the part. In essence, the Beijing Olympics is just like everything else made in China: fake and useless.
Now, of the few people who are capable of a tiny amount of independent thought and actually realize what horrible acts are being committed by the Communists on the Chinese, only a few of them realize what should receive blame for what. Liberals in the West will find any imaginable way to desecrate the only working governmental system known-capitalism-and this case is no exception. Instead of getting angry at those repulsive Communist Chinese, they do their best to find reasons to be pissed-off at capitalists. For example, outrage is thrown at McDonald's for advertising the Olympics and using it to get money. But that's not right. All McDonald's is doing is getting profits-there's nothing wrong with that; they need those profits to keep their corporation going. What's wrong with keeping yourself well-fed? The answer is nothing: that's what capitalists do and that's how capitalist countries keep on working long after all other countries fall apart. Think about it, folks.
I was watching a program recently, and it was about the effect of the Olympics on the Chinese population. I gotta tell you, from what I can see, it's just about the worst atrocity committed on the Chinese people since those commie SOBs took power. (At least, the worst one that gets reported to the West). People were forced from their homes so they could build sections of the Olympic stadiums and ceremonial sites and so on that were needed. Civilians were basically told "get out of here or go to prison," were tossed out on the street, and were incapable of complaining to anybody about it because, guess what? In China, you've got no rights! If you complain about losing your house so some guy from the other side of the planet can run for a hundred meters or so, you go to jail! Individuals don't own their homes, the state does, so they get booted out of them for the enjoyment of people everywhere from Canada to Australia (going east, that is).
China has essentially destroyed the Olympics, and here's how. Instead of having real fireworks (which you'd think they'd be well-stocked with since they invented the damn things), they make ones using a computer-those aren't fireworks you're watching, they're binary code made into colorful shapes. And for the kid who sang that stupid little song for the opening ceremony, they made her lip synch, because the kid who actually sang it wasn't cute enough for the part. In essence, the Beijing Olympics is just like everything else made in China: fake and useless.
Now, of the few people who are capable of a tiny amount of independent thought and actually realize what horrible acts are being committed by the Communists on the Chinese, only a few of them realize what should receive blame for what. Liberals in the West will find any imaginable way to desecrate the only working governmental system known-capitalism-and this case is no exception. Instead of getting angry at those repulsive Communist Chinese, they do their best to find reasons to be pissed-off at capitalists. For example, outrage is thrown at McDonald's for advertising the Olympics and using it to get money. But that's not right. All McDonald's is doing is getting profits-there's nothing wrong with that; they need those profits to keep their corporation going. What's wrong with keeping yourself well-fed? The answer is nothing: that's what capitalists do and that's how capitalist countries keep on working long after all other countries fall apart. Think about it, folks.
Sunday, August 3, 2008
Screw-up
Folks, as many of you know, I spend a lot of time on the computer. A LOT of time on the computer. Now, while this may someday result in me having a very large gut and a lonely death by heart attack, for the moment it is working to my advantage. For example, it has allowed me to make these blogs with a certain degree of credibility. As you'll read in this article:
http://www.wtopnews.com/index.php?nid=105&sid=1448629
a Canadian soldier recently killed two children in an Afghani car. The vehicle was driving at high speeds next to his convoy and the driver drove it as if it were going to attack the Canuck soldiers. So, the Canadian opens fire on the vehicle, killing a two-year-old boy and his four-year-old sister, although the driver-their father-was apparently unharmed.
Now, frankly this sounds like a reasonable mistake on the Canadian's part. The driver was driving like an idiot near a military convoy-not a good idea-and the soldier, who had more than likely seen his fair share of Taliban nut-jobs attack convoys with Toyotas, interpreted this as hostile and opened fire. If you ask me, the soldier was just doing his job and, had that actually been a Taliwacker vehicle, he would have saved his own life and the lives of his comrades. Of course, this incident is instantly used as fodder for Liberal and commie scum throughout North America. Immediately after the shooting reached Canadian papers, outrage spreads amongst the anti-war people (despite having the collective intelligence of a single down-syndrome afflicted slug, Liberals are still technically people). Many folks throughout the net, on Youtube, blogging sites, and so on voice their opinions on the matter. Ones that are capable of independent thought understood that it was a simple fuck-up and that no one (except possibly the father, for driving like an idiot) should be blamed.
But, as for those who just think "what would Michael Moore do?" They instantly say that the Canadian soldier is a sick, baby-eating monster and that he should be punished severely. Which is odd, since nobody acts out when this happens. For those of you that didn't follow the link I just gave, what I said was that nobody acts out when innocent children are killed intentionally by the terrorists. I can understand shooting a car driving like that at your convoy in a warzone, but I do not tolerate Taliban sons of bitches blowing themselves up in schools. Strangely enough, liberal dirtbags do tolerate that, because, after all, we invaded Afghanistan and are trying to rebuild it. That gives the enemy the right to murder civilians intentionally, right? WRONG. Any psychotic commie freak that thinks that should get their head checked out.
The fact of the matter is that our soldiers only kill kids by accident. Our enemy kills them intentionally because they use the murdering of children to get them power-they claim that the attacks will stop if we leave. So, who is worse? The people who don't mean to kill children and are here to help a destroyed country, or the people that go around blowing schools and the kids inside and are doing it so they can take control of the country again? Think about it, folks.
http://www.wtopnews.com/index.php?nid=105&sid=1448629
a Canadian soldier recently killed two children in an Afghani car. The vehicle was driving at high speeds next to his convoy and the driver drove it as if it were going to attack the Canuck soldiers. So, the Canadian opens fire on the vehicle, killing a two-year-old boy and his four-year-old sister, although the driver-their father-was apparently unharmed.
Now, frankly this sounds like a reasonable mistake on the Canadian's part. The driver was driving like an idiot near a military convoy-not a good idea-and the soldier, who had more than likely seen his fair share of Taliban nut-jobs attack convoys with Toyotas, interpreted this as hostile and opened fire. If you ask me, the soldier was just doing his job and, had that actually been a Taliwacker vehicle, he would have saved his own life and the lives of his comrades. Of course, this incident is instantly used as fodder for Liberal and commie scum throughout North America. Immediately after the shooting reached Canadian papers, outrage spreads amongst the anti-war people (despite having the collective intelligence of a single down-syndrome afflicted slug, Liberals are still technically people). Many folks throughout the net, on Youtube, blogging sites, and so on voice their opinions on the matter. Ones that are capable of independent thought understood that it was a simple fuck-up and that no one (except possibly the father, for driving like an idiot) should be blamed.
But, as for those who just think "what would Michael Moore do?" They instantly say that the Canadian soldier is a sick, baby-eating monster and that he should be punished severely. Which is odd, since nobody acts out when this happens. For those of you that didn't follow the link I just gave, what I said was that nobody acts out when innocent children are killed intentionally by the terrorists. I can understand shooting a car driving like that at your convoy in a warzone, but I do not tolerate Taliban sons of bitches blowing themselves up in schools. Strangely enough, liberal dirtbags do tolerate that, because, after all, we invaded Afghanistan and are trying to rebuild it. That gives the enemy the right to murder civilians intentionally, right? WRONG. Any psychotic commie freak that thinks that should get their head checked out.
The fact of the matter is that our soldiers only kill kids by accident. Our enemy kills them intentionally because they use the murdering of children to get them power-they claim that the attacks will stop if we leave. So, who is worse? The people who don't mean to kill children and are here to help a destroyed country, or the people that go around blowing schools and the kids inside and are doing it so they can take control of the country again? Think about it, folks.
Saturday, July 19, 2008
Bigotry
Folks, after yet another long break--this time because of a vacation--I'm back in black and I've got another interesting rant for you. In this case, I will deal with bigotry.
Sure, in the past I have said some...politically incorrect statements, and it is probably true that I suffer from bigotry. Come to think of it, I've said some things that would make a relaxed Muslim/Communist who had never been angry in his life explode with rage. And, frankly, I'm not sorry for saying those things at all. I based my opinions on facts and it's my style to be offensive--it gets my point across better. There is good and bad bigotry: good bigotry is based upon facts and events in the past.
The bigotry I don't appreciate, however, is the kind that not only exists with no reasonable explanation, but the kind that stops one from thinking properly. An example of bad bigotry is the kind most Canadians have towards Americans, and the kind I'm sure most Americans have towards Canucks. Having lived in Canada all my life, I can guarantee you that we have an irrational fear and hate of the United States. People as young as twelve here rant on about how the US is evil and how the US threatened to bomb Canada at various parts in history. Of course, on all accounts these children don't know what they're talking about and they're just basing what they say on a collection of "facts" gathered from Wikipedia and the leftist media.
But bigotry against America is not the worst. There are still people named Billy Ray, whose mother, aunt, cousin, niece and grandmother are all the same person, who are horribly enraged with blacks, Jews, and basically anyone that Hitler didn't appreciate. What is the point? Why can't they just come out of their little shells that they've been hiding in for the last few hundred years? Racism is usually completely baseless or totally exaggerated: people who hate blacks probably think that they were responsible for the Civil War (which is laughable), those who are disgusted with Americans probably think that all they want is oil and global domination (which is just plain stupid), and the folks that hate Jews are the same people that hate blacks and Americans, so they have no credibility and are amusingly brainless. Think about it, folks.
Sure, in the past I have said some...politically incorrect statements, and it is probably true that I suffer from bigotry. Come to think of it, I've said some things that would make a relaxed Muslim/Communist who had never been angry in his life explode with rage. And, frankly, I'm not sorry for saying those things at all. I based my opinions on facts and it's my style to be offensive--it gets my point across better. There is good and bad bigotry: good bigotry is based upon facts and events in the past.
The bigotry I don't appreciate, however, is the kind that not only exists with no reasonable explanation, but the kind that stops one from thinking properly. An example of bad bigotry is the kind most Canadians have towards Americans, and the kind I'm sure most Americans have towards Canucks. Having lived in Canada all my life, I can guarantee you that we have an irrational fear and hate of the United States. People as young as twelve here rant on about how the US is evil and how the US threatened to bomb Canada at various parts in history. Of course, on all accounts these children don't know what they're talking about and they're just basing what they say on a collection of "facts" gathered from Wikipedia and the leftist media.
But bigotry against America is not the worst. There are still people named Billy Ray, whose mother, aunt, cousin, niece and grandmother are all the same person, who are horribly enraged with blacks, Jews, and basically anyone that Hitler didn't appreciate. What is the point? Why can't they just come out of their little shells that they've been hiding in for the last few hundred years? Racism is usually completely baseless or totally exaggerated: people who hate blacks probably think that they were responsible for the Civil War (which is laughable), those who are disgusted with Americans probably think that all they want is oil and global domination (which is just plain stupid), and the folks that hate Jews are the same people that hate blacks and Americans, so they have no credibility and are amusingly brainless. Think about it, folks.
Sunday, June 29, 2008
Well folks, after another irritatingly long break from blogging, I'm back. What can I say? It takes time to find important information on the world today, research it, and then make a lengthy, satisfactory rant on it. As usual, I will blather on about problems created by Commies/Liberals.
In this case, it has to do with something that is common with communists and liberals. Paranoia. When I say paranoia I refer to their irrational fear of the current government (provided that the current government was not the one they voted for). This fear is evidenced by a whole series of sites on the net that say "George Bush did this" or "the government is doing that." One of the biggest ones is the 9/11 conspiracy theory. Now, what these people appear to believe is that the government perpetrated the destruction of the Twin Towers and faked the whole hijacking using some specially trained agents. Before I say anything on this, I recommend you check out this site before moving on:
http://debunking911.com/index.html
As the site will explain in greater detail, the paranoid communist liberals, bitter about the results of the 2000 election, are completely irrational and quite possibly insane...if not utterly braindead. In fact, as explained in this site which was clearly written by a professional, many things the paranoid, delusional commies have ranted about have literally no basis in fact.
For example: it has been said that thermite charges cut through steel, making an exploding noise of some sort as they did so. First of all: thermite DOES NOT MAKE ANY SORT OF BOOM, BANG OR CLANG. There is absolutely no way that anyone more than ten feet away from the thermite could hear it burn sideways, melting a vertical column of metal--which, by the way, is also quite impossible.
These people tell us to "open our eyes" all the time and then, should we question their theories, criticize and make asses out of us for doing so. They don't let us wonder about what is told to us unless we are wondering about what their opponents told us. I guarantee you that if you at first state that you agree with someone who was just explaining how Bush planned 9/11 and so on, he'll say "good for you! You're thinking outside the box!" And then verbally disagree with someone else who also said Bush planned it all, he'll say "you are a narrow-minded fascist pig! How could you not open your eyes and realize that Bush is the evilest bastard on earth!"
This is my response to the latter statement:
"Well, here's how I can't accept that notion. First of all, I've actually done a little thing that you might call a waste of time--research--to base my argument on. Second of all, once obtaining this information, rather than listening to some aging pothead who was a public demonstrator against the Vietnam War in the 70's, I used something you may call absurd. This something is known as logic. After all this, I have determined that Bush didn't actually hold all the cards on Sept. 11, 2001, and that he in fact started the Afghanistan War to do something you are too much of a coward to do: retaliate. "
Of course, as the narrow-minded commie scum was too high on pot at the time to actually understand a word of that, he will brand me a Nazi and say that I am just another drone for Bush. That's how these people actually think. Anyways, I hope you keep an open mind when you think about it, folks.
In this case, it has to do with something that is common with communists and liberals. Paranoia. When I say paranoia I refer to their irrational fear of the current government (provided that the current government was not the one they voted for). This fear is evidenced by a whole series of sites on the net that say "George Bush did this" or "the government is doing that." One of the biggest ones is the 9/11 conspiracy theory. Now, what these people appear to believe is that the government perpetrated the destruction of the Twin Towers and faked the whole hijacking using some specially trained agents. Before I say anything on this, I recommend you check out this site before moving on:
http://debunking911.com/index.html
As the site will explain in greater detail, the paranoid communist liberals, bitter about the results of the 2000 election, are completely irrational and quite possibly insane...if not utterly braindead. In fact, as explained in this site which was clearly written by a professional, many things the paranoid, delusional commies have ranted about have literally no basis in fact.
For example: it has been said that thermite charges cut through steel, making an exploding noise of some sort as they did so. First of all: thermite DOES NOT MAKE ANY SORT OF BOOM, BANG OR CLANG. There is absolutely no way that anyone more than ten feet away from the thermite could hear it burn sideways, melting a vertical column of metal--which, by the way, is also quite impossible.
These people tell us to "open our eyes" all the time and then, should we question their theories, criticize and make asses out of us for doing so. They don't let us wonder about what is told to us unless we are wondering about what their opponents told us. I guarantee you that if you at first state that you agree with someone who was just explaining how Bush planned 9/11 and so on, he'll say "good for you! You're thinking outside the box!" And then verbally disagree with someone else who also said Bush planned it all, he'll say "you are a narrow-minded fascist pig! How could you not open your eyes and realize that Bush is the evilest bastard on earth!"
This is my response to the latter statement:
"Well, here's how I can't accept that notion. First of all, I've actually done a little thing that you might call a waste of time--research--to base my argument on. Second of all, once obtaining this information, rather than listening to some aging pothead who was a public demonstrator against the Vietnam War in the 70's, I used something you may call absurd. This something is known as logic. After all this, I have determined that Bush didn't actually hold all the cards on Sept. 11, 2001, and that he in fact started the Afghanistan War to do something you are too much of a coward to do: retaliate. "
Of course, as the narrow-minded commie scum was too high on pot at the time to actually understand a word of that, he will brand me a Nazi and say that I am just another drone for Bush. That's how these people actually think. Anyways, I hope you keep an open mind when you think about it, folks.
Sunday, June 15, 2008
Weak stomach
The United States is a great, powerful nation in many ways. Its military is massive and well-equipped, it is the most technologically advanced country in the world, and it has a vast wealth of natural resources. In many ways it would be invincible to any attack from a hostile nation. But it does have one major problem: a weak stomach and therefore a lack of respect.
What do I mean? According to an article (http://www.airforcetimes.com/news/2008/01/airforce_china_strategy_080121/)
The Americans get very little respect. Here's why: as the article explains, the Chinese say the U.S has a public that is "abnormally sensitive about military casualties." In their eyes the American public is so afraid of troop deaths that any large casualty numbers would result in a massive anti-war movement. The American public is terrified of losing its men and women. But the Communists? You could kill a few million of 'em and they would neither notice nor care -- they'd just get angry. While the Americans start burning their own nation's flag and insult the President when they attack a bad guy, the Chinese cheer and wave Red flags when their tanks roll into somebody else's country.
No wonder Muslim extremists think they can win in the Middle East. They know, just as the Chinese do, that the United States is too enfeebled to fight a prolonged and costly war. On the other hand, the terrorists and the communists are tough. They don't care how many perish: as long as they win in the end, the losses don't matter. This percolates through from the government or terrorist group down to the average Chinese, Afghani, or Iraqi civilian. It's the same thing for all totalitarian nations: the Soviet Union lost eleven million people in World War II, and yet it glorified the war as much as possible over the next forty-six years. Despite losing hundreds of thousands of men for just fifty-thousand Americans, the North Vietnamese persevered throughout the Vietnam War. On the Muslim side of things, many actually glorify death. If you're a one of these and are killed in war, you are a martyr and are venerated. Maybe that's why they fought so hard through the Soviet War in Afghanistan, and maybe that's why neither Iraq nor Iran admitted defeat in the 1980-1988 war.
If the American public had a stronger stomach, the country would be feared and respected. Unfortunately, it is scared shitless of losing its citizens in battle. For that reason, America will always be disrespected by its foes. Think about it, folks.
What do I mean? According to an article (http://www.airforcetimes.com/news/2008/01/airforce_china_strategy_080121/)
The Americans get very little respect. Here's why: as the article explains, the Chinese say the U.S has a public that is "abnormally sensitive about military casualties." In their eyes the American public is so afraid of troop deaths that any large casualty numbers would result in a massive anti-war movement. The American public is terrified of losing its men and women. But the Communists? You could kill a few million of 'em and they would neither notice nor care -- they'd just get angry. While the Americans start burning their own nation's flag and insult the President when they attack a bad guy, the Chinese cheer and wave Red flags when their tanks roll into somebody else's country.
No wonder Muslim extremists think they can win in the Middle East. They know, just as the Chinese do, that the United States is too enfeebled to fight a prolonged and costly war. On the other hand, the terrorists and the communists are tough. They don't care how many perish: as long as they win in the end, the losses don't matter. This percolates through from the government or terrorist group down to the average Chinese, Afghani, or Iraqi civilian. It's the same thing for all totalitarian nations: the Soviet Union lost eleven million people in World War II, and yet it glorified the war as much as possible over the next forty-six years. Despite losing hundreds of thousands of men for just fifty-thousand Americans, the North Vietnamese persevered throughout the Vietnam War. On the Muslim side of things, many actually glorify death. If you're a one of these and are killed in war, you are a martyr and are venerated. Maybe that's why they fought so hard through the Soviet War in Afghanistan, and maybe that's why neither Iraq nor Iran admitted defeat in the 1980-1988 war.
If the American public had a stronger stomach, the country would be feared and respected. Unfortunately, it is scared shitless of losing its citizens in battle. For that reason, America will always be disrespected by its foes. Think about it, folks.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
