Liberal stupidity

I hate to be overly political (well, not really, seeing as this entire blog is based on my scientific and political views), folks, but I think there's a major flaw with Climate Change.

According to David Suzuki and his life partner Al Gore, the release of carbon dioxide emissions into the air causes the Greenhouse Effect. Now, that's not where the flaw is-the flaw is that they say that this will somehow bring about the destruction and death of the earth. Am I missing something rather large here? Is it just me, or does that not make any sense? How will the world end if the earth gets a few degrees warmer? I don't see the reason in this. Even if the ice caps did melt and flood major cities and such, there would still be no severe problems that would destroy the earth. Come to think of it, conditions for life would improve. For example: all those starving kids in Ethiopia? Not starvin' no more because Ethiopia is rich thanks to a massive fishing industry and a beautiful climate that attracts tourism, with its enemy Eritrea being totally flooded, ending the wars between the two countries.

But this is not the only problem with Climate Change. Another major flaw in reasoning is that humans are the cause of it. According to Al Gore, Suzuki and other people who claim to be scientists but actually know nothing of the world around them, that rather large ball of burning Hydrogen and Helium-the one eight light minutes away-has nothing to do with the earth's temperature. I suppose I can see that-the reasoning for the Global Warmians being that the sun only effects the earth's temperature slightly. Or at least I would be able to see that if it weren't for the fact that for the past 4.5 billion years the global temperature has been going hand-in-hand with the sun's activity. If you look at a graph of the sun's activity since 1900 and the earth's temperature? Big surprise: the two graphs practically mirror each other. Interestingly enough, for about as long as the Global Warmists have been babbling nonsensically, the sun's activity has been unusually high. Sunspots and solar flares and such were very common-when the sun was warmer, the earth was warmer. But now the activity of the sun is starting to go down. So is the warmists' argument. In most of Israel it was snowing for several days straight just a month or so ago, while Tehran is facing record cold temperatures. Does this not seem odd to you? But if you're still not convinced, how about we go to Eastern Canada, where most of the global warming bulls**t came from. For the past several weeks it has been colder than it has been in many years, with thick ice and snow covering the landscape. Seems mighty odd for a planet that's doomed by warming, don't it? A little while ago people were worried about the ice shelf to the north of Canada-the Liberal Warmists were complaining that if we didn't cut back on greenhouse gas emissions, the ice would disappear entirely. Now they ignore it-and why? Because the ice shelf is a lot thicker now. Huge glaciers of ice are reconnecting there, and they don't want you to know it, because they know that it would damage their argument. Think about it, folks.