Folks, as many of you know, I spend a lot of time on the computer. A LOT of time on the computer. Now, while this may someday result in me having a very large gut and a lonely death by heart attack, for the moment it is working to my advantage. For example, it has allowed me to make these blogs with a certain degree of credibility. As you'll read in this article:
http://www.wtopnews.com/index.php?nid=105&sid=1448629
a Canadian soldier recently killed two children in an Afghani car. The vehicle was driving at high speeds next to his convoy and the driver drove it as if it were going to attack the Canuck soldiers. So, the Canadian opens fire on the vehicle, killing a two-year-old boy and his four-year-old sister, although the driver-their father-was apparently unharmed.
Now, frankly this sounds like a reasonable mistake on the Canadian's part. The driver was driving like an idiot near a military convoy-not a good idea-and the soldier, who had more than likely seen his fair share of Taliban nut-jobs attack convoys with Toyotas, interpreted this as hostile and opened fire. If you ask me, the soldier was just doing his job and, had that actually been a Taliwacker vehicle, he would have saved his own life and the lives of his comrades. Of course, this incident is instantly used as fodder for Liberal and commie scum throughout North America. Immediately after the shooting reached Canadian papers, outrage spreads amongst the anti-war people (despite having the collective intelligence of a single down-syndrome afflicted slug, Liberals are still technically people). Many folks throughout the net, on Youtube, blogging sites, and so on voice their opinions on the matter. Ones that are capable of independent thought understood that it was a simple fuck-up and that no one (except possibly the father, for driving like an idiot) should be blamed.
But, as for those who just think "what would Michael Moore do?" They instantly say that the Canadian soldier is a sick, baby-eating monster and that he should be punished severely. Which is odd, since nobody acts out when this happens. For those of you that didn't follow the link I just gave, what I said was that nobody acts out when innocent children are killed intentionally by the terrorists. I can understand shooting a car driving like that at your convoy in a warzone, but I do not tolerate Taliban sons of bitches blowing themselves up in schools. Strangely enough, liberal dirtbags do tolerate that, because, after all, we invaded Afghanistan and are trying to rebuild it. That gives the enemy the right to murder civilians intentionally, right? WRONG. Any psychotic commie freak that thinks that should get their head checked out.
The fact of the matter is that our soldiers only kill kids by accident. Our enemy kills them intentionally because they use the murdering of children to get them power-they claim that the attacks will stop if we leave. So, who is worse? The people who don't mean to kill children and are here to help a destroyed country, or the people that go around blowing schools and the kids inside and are doing it so they can take control of the country again? Think about it, folks.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment