A break from the typical political ranting

Alright, folks, I'm runnin' out of politically incorrect rants for the moment, but don't worry, I can still rant.

Let's say an alien comes from a planet with an atmosphere of sulpher, lakes of liquid methane, and with a generally unearthly landscape. He has one huge eye on the top of his gigantic, spherical body, with tentacles and spikes jutting out of every square inch of his protective shell. When he is born, his hyper-advanced species downloads all the information we humans wouldn't be able to learn in our entire lifetimes directly into his huge brain. This allows him to immediately begin exploring the galaxy without having to spend years of training to do so.

Now, this alien arrives at our planet in a flying saucer, remaining inside his vehicle and monitoring our people from orbit. The first thing he notices is our huge cities, which he somewhat recognizes, as all of his homeworld except for the most impassable mountain ranges is covered with a city. But, when monitoring the people living in the homes, he finds several disturbing images.

Let's say he's looking into the lives of a dysfunctional family in a trailer park. Fifteen people, only two of them more than two years old (the parents), sleep in a single room in a poorly-made trailer, eat food made in the most unsanitary kitchen imaginable, and entertain themselves by drinking alcohol and watching a tiny television. Usually, the apparent alpha dog of this family, which the alien assumes is a normal family for the humans, AKA the father, drinks about two bottles of what we call Jack Daniels in a day and beats the living hell out of his wife and kids. After this the alien, who has never slept a day in his life as his species does not require rest, sees the family lie down on their strange, soft pad. For the next eight to twelve hours they remain unconscious, before finally waking, at which point they begin to repeat what they did the previous day. The mother works at a small building, cooking food for a very low wage, while the father and kids sit around the house and watch their tiny television.

The alien decides not to make first contact with these people, believing they are dangerous. He proceeds to destroy the earth with a laser beam, ending the lives of six billion people without any warning.

Think about it, folks.

Political correctness (AKA: Political football)

There are many wrong things most believe are right in this world. Global Warming, communism, Kosovo, Family Guy, and numerous others. And to tell ya the truth, folks, I don't mind those ones as much as most because they're not accepted widely-they're just a minor inconvenience that I like to rant about.

But then there are things that are widely believed to be right when they are one of the wrongest things imaginable. What am I prattling on about? In this case, censorship. Political correctness. Nowadays you can get sued for making a joke about women, tossed in jail for calling somebody fat, and get your ass blown up for insulting Islam. The problem with censorship is that not only does it limit our freedoms, taking away our rights, but it also is terrorism that we follow with glee. We can't say that Islam is the ridiculous, evil cult that it is on television because the television corporations are afraid of getting hit with suicide bombers. That is the terrorists prevailing right there: they have already taken away our right of free speech-now they're working on the right to worship and to vote. We let them win by blocking anyone that even attempts to make eve the slightest crack at them, probably all because some Danish man depicted Muhammad.

But its not just the ragheads that we have to worry about anymore. Now everybody wants to censor everything: feminists are calling men chauvinist pigs because they make the slightest little sexist comment. At the same time, others are trying to steal the right to say "nigger" because it's considered very racist. Of course, any black man can say it because then its not a curse, it's just something he says to his friends, or his kids, or his own goddamn grand parents. But if whitey says it, then it's off with his head (metaphorically speaking).

Despite this, television becomes more depraved and insane. On one hand, we can't say nigger or call blond women dumb, on the other hand, we are fine with the average commercial showing soft-core porn and a talking, martini-drinking dog. Now, personally, I like the former half of that statement, and I don't think it should change, but I should be able to say whatever I want on television. If I want to call Islam a cult based on the insane ramblings of some pedophile named Muhammad, then I should be able to do so on any media. It's not just a way of keeping our rights, it's a way of fighting terrorism. Think about it, folks.

Whoops!

Sorry, folks, in the last post I said

"They let the atrocities of the enemy overshadow the occasional minor mistake of the U.S soldier"

What I meant was

"They let the occasional minor mistake of the U.S soldier overshadow the atrocities of the enemy."

Sorry for any confusion that caused, folks.

More Liberal Stupidity

Sorry for the few days I spent away from the blog, folks. But, for every few days I spend away from the blog, there's several amazing minutes of ranting and raving to read.

Ya know what's a real problem in this world? When the time comes for war, we let the enemy gain support and our own side lose it. Take the Iraq War for example: I don't see anyone outside the White House complaining about how some Raghead blows himself up at a restaurant, killing forty civilians and wounding fifty. But if an American soldier accidentally shoots a civilian because he could have been with the Mujahideen? In minutes the president's getting his head bitten off by commie, terrorist-supporting Liberals who think that every person who carries an M16 instead of an AK-47 came straight from hell. These people make me sick. They let the atrocities of the enemy overshadow the occasional minor mistake made by our troops-and they also make disgusting, often completely nonsensical claims. For example, many Liberals tend to say that the war in Iraq is for oil. They continue to claim this despite the fact that the U.S government could not possibly hope to gain more than it spends on the conflict.

These Liberals think that everyone fighting against the ragheads are evil. Israel, for example, is criticized horribly because it attempts to take out the rocket launchers that fire randomly at Israeli towns. The Liberals appear to believe that the ragheads are heroic warriors fighting for freedom-that's not what they're fighting for, damn it! They want control. Why else would the Taliban still be fighting a guerrilla war despite having lost all hope of winning? The ragheads have nothing on their mind other than control. It's all they think about: the Taliban want Afghanistan back, and will continue trying to get it back until they're all dead. They want to control the earth, and in order to do that they feel that they need to control the Middle East first. They will not stop until they die, because the only thing that a terrorist thinks about is control. All Akbar wants is to exercise total control over his people. Take pre-2001 Afghanistan as an example: in order to control the people, essentially all forms of media were banned. While women were beaten for not completely covering their bodies, the men and children were deprived of going to the movies or enjoying themselves. The leaders did this solely for control and nothing else; they don't care for their people because if they do what the people want, they will not be exercising complete control.

These Liberals are either evil or stupid, depending on who it is. Michael Moore: we can tell he is stupid because he felt that the ragheads would win the Second Battle of Fallujah, which the ragheads lost terribly thanks to their being totally disorganized. Others can be determined to be evil: anyone that shouts out "Death to Israel" is probably not like the fat, cowardly Moore. He is instead evil, wanting only the death of the Jews and the control of their country. Think about it, folks.

T.V sucks...usually

Family Guy, the Simpsons, and about a hundred other television shows that are exactly the same are an excellent topic for a rant.

There are very few types of T.V shows nowadays. First, you've got the disgusting crime dramas (eg. C.S.I), all of which consist of a zillion episodes thanks to their huge ratings-and not one unique episode thanks to crappy writers. These shows are all exactly the same: a guy or girl-usually a girl, and usually a particularly beautiful one at that-is found brutally murdered. All of the main characters are completely stoic when they first see the body, usually opening up with an amazingly, mind-numbingly stupid line intended to be clever based on the way the guy was killed or the place they were in when being killed. Following this is a lengthy investigation involving the corpses getting dissected in very dark morgues, completely impossible and disgusting situations like finding sperm inside the eye socket of the largely eaten victim, and with plenty of stupid and unrealistic drama. Finally, they find the killer, fill in all the plot holes in a matter of minutes, and get the criminal to confess easily. Seeing that kinda crap once is enough for me-I don't want to watch six or seven seasons of it.

Second of all, we've got the comedy cartoons/sitcoms. Sitcoms and cartoons are now exactly the same: fatass, middle-aged dad is caring for 2-8 kids, every day going through "wacky" situations. Wacky in this case can mean anything from the fatass dads' daughter thinking she's pregnant before she finds out just before getting married to her boyfriend that she's not pregnant (Family Guy) to amazingly mundane situations, such as the light-bulb going out or a bird setting up a nest on the house (any sitcom). At first, these shows start out pretty good and funny (The Simpsons), and for several seasons they are good and funny. But then they start to become less funny and more "wacky," or in other words, less good and more moronic. Eventually, it goes from moronic to psychotic. Family Guy started off moronic before going psychotic, so it did not really get much worse since its beginning. But the Simpsons, on the other hand, has gone from one of the funniest shows ever made, to one of the stupidest, to among the top most bizarre. And one last thing about these poor excuses of comedy is that they always end with some childish lesson that the characters always learn.
"You know, Bill, I've learned something today. When you cross the street, you really do have to look both ways."
Really? I did not know that. A show rated 18A is teaching me something. Wow. I didn't watch this show to learn, goddamn it, I watched it to see profanity and nudity!
That's why I like Trailer Park Boys: they never learn anything and their adventures are not completely moronic/psychotic.

Finally, we have reality T.V. Look, first of all, if it's on T.V, it should not involve "Reality" unless it's the frickin' news or if its on that Spike channel. They call Survivor a reality show because, supposedly, the people have to survive being on an island for several weeks. Yeah, that's right, they're gonna send some hot chicks and dumb guys to a random island in the middle of the South Pacific Ocean and leave them for a week or so. It's just stupid: anyone who thinks that's real should get their head checked out. It's a studio with a pool made to look like a beach. It's that simple-there is no way they would leave those people out there, because if they did, they would come back to find all of them getting eaten by sharks.

There are many other classes of T.V shows I could complain about, but because this is my longest rant yet, I think I should rap it up. There are very few good shows nowadays-these ones being, in my opinion, Trailer Park Boys, Disorderly Conduct: Video on Patrol, and a few of those shows that take place in the future and in space. Everything else needs a lot of improvement. Think about it, folks.

Back to dah blog

Alright, folks, after a long break from blogging, I'm back. And I got a brand-new rant for ya.

There is a major problem with the North American and Western European countries, as well as with the Scandinavian nations. This problem is with our prisons. To elaborate, our prisons are too nice-we do not deal with criminals with the proper fashion. For example, murderers, even child-killers, have rights when they are tossed in jail. Now, thieves and drug dealers aren't that bad; they're just trying to make a living, and so they don't necessarily need to be punished brutally, that I admit. But some fifty-five year old son of a bitch that rapes and murders a sixteen-year old girl? As soon as he's convicted he should be executed-no life sentences, no sympathy, and absolutely no rights while he's in jail. The justice system should not be a punishment; it needs to be a way of removing threats from the population. Of course, a thief and a drug dealer, or even someone who accidentally runs over somebody should be punished but not permanently removed.

But most justice systems don't see it this way: if you kill your own spouse in Canada, the worst you'll get is 25 years without parole. Usually, however, you'll get parole and it won't be 25 years: it will probably be closer to ten or fifteen years.

But let's go to China. In China, do you know what happens to some bastard who decides he doesn't like his nextdoor neighbor and expresses himself with an ax or a pistol? They hang him! He's also killed in public.

An even better system of execution can be found in the Muslim countries of the Middle East. You want to murder someone? Say hello to Mr. Guillotine. These people are also dealt with in public and are never again a threat to the general population.

But the problem with these countries is that their justice systems cannot track down the bad guys well enough because either, in the case of China, it's too easy to disappear into the massive population, or, in the case of the raghead countries, they just don't have the technology to find them or prove that they were the killers. But if the West combined these brutal and effective methods of taking down the worst criminals with our ability to convict them, then the problems with crime in our countries would disappear totally. Think about it, folks.

Obesity? What's that? Oh, you mean lard-bags!

Okay, folks, I gotta say something to anyone that's obese. You say that you're unable to help it, that you were born obese and that there's nothing you can do about it because it's in your genes. According to obese people, either they're "big boned" or have a "wide girth." That's a load of horses**t! Of course, you must be big boned in order for your bones to hold that much lard, and yes, I suppose you do have a wide girth, but I would be more inclined to call it a fat ass. There are people out there who try and fight obesity, who try and help kids who are fat by sending them to fat camps or by humiliating them on television. That's not how you do it. Here's how ya do it: let's say Big Timmy is eating too much, and becomes fat. First of all, you do not call him big boned or use any sort of euphemism to describe him-either he's just plain fat or he's lardo. Either way, if you refer to him like this, provided that he has any willpower at all he will take at least some measure to correct his weight. But, of course, no kid has that much willpower. So, here's the second thing you do: take the burger full of four beef patties out of his hand and replace it with a ham and lettuce sandwich. It's gonna take a lotta ham and lettuce sandwiches for him to keep that fat-too many for him to eat, so eventually the guy's weight will go down.

But the real problem with these people is the fact that they think they're blameless. Anyone who thinks that they have no say in what's happening to them should be smacked upside the head with something heavy and blunt. Sure, there are some things you really can't do anything about-cancer just happens to some people, even if they've never smoked or done anything unhealthy in their lives. But obesity is not a cancer. Obesity, and by that I mean fatness, is something that people do to themselves-unless, of course, you're saying that eating a half a ton of ice cream and McDonald's every day of your life will have no effect on your weight. You see, research has shown that there are genes which cause people to be overweight. Alright, fine, there's no problem with that, sometimes they can't help it but be a little big. But weighing 400 pounds and being incapable of moving? No gene does that to you-only you do that to you. The fact of the matter is that these people have curable eating disorders. How do you cure them? Lock them up with other vats 'o fat. Just keep them locked up in a controlled environment and feed them three meals a day with nothing but very healthy food. Michael Moore looks like Michael Jackson with a fuzzy orange beard when he leaves.

Nobody should think that they are blameless for their weight. If you weigh more than 50% of the average weight for someone your age and height, then obviously you need to put down the frickin' cheeseburger and start doing some push-ups. Like I said, your genes might make you a little overweight, and that's okay. But if you weigh too much to get out of bed, then there's obviously a little more than some microscopic strands of DNA at fault. Think about it, folks.

Another day, another rant

Here's something I just gotta rant about, folks. Cyber-terrorists. Have you ever seen these guys? Go look up something-anything-to do with the Iraq War or America on, let's say Youtube, and you'll come up with some of the most despicable lies I've ever seen. For example, this one fellow made a video babbling on about the "American Empire" and how horrible the United States is, stating facts about percentage of obesity and illiteracy. The guy's from Russia, and he's saying that the U.S.A is a bad country based on some facts he got straight from Wikipedia. He's from Russia! He completely ignores the fact that Russia is a dying nation, with its people often not being able to educate themselves and with the percentage of illiterate people being disturbingly high. You think the U.S is a bad country? At least they don't have half the population addicted to Vodka, and the other half being too old to have children. Sure, the Americans tend to be addicted to burgers, but hey! There's still going to be an America in a hundred years. Russia? I'm not so sure.

But it's not only those supposedly no longer communist Reds that are causing trouble. Let's look over to the Muslims, or, more specifically, the very few Iraqis that have computers. One of them made an entire video about destroyed tanks, all of which he claimed were American. First of all, if they were American tanks, then what was the Syrian flag doing on half of them, and why were they in black and white pictures that appear to be from the Six Day and Yom Kippur Wars? Oh, yeah, that's right, it was because not one of them was an American tank, old or modern, and they were all the ones that the Israelis destroyed in droves!

It really sickens me to see these terrorist scumbags. Some claim that the United States will be destroyed by Islam in a few years. Right, that makes sense: a few guys hiding in rat-infested spider-holes in the middle of Iraq with RPGs are going to destroy the most industrialized country-with the best army by the way-on the entire planet. Do you know what their reasoning for this ridiculous belief is? Supposedly, their twisted version of god is going to give them some sort of a miracle that they can use to murder men, women and children. I gotta tell you, it's going to take a lotta praying for god to salvage your mission after its gone this wrong. But Akbar Shiite-hed continues to go everywhere, from the internet to some poor village in Iraq or Afghanistan, keeping up the false hope that he will not be blown into a fine red paste by an American tank or fighter-bomber. Support our troops so Akbar gets taught a lesson he won't soon forget. Think about it, folks.

Liberal stupidity

I hate to be overly political (well, not really, seeing as this entire blog is based on my scientific and political views), folks, but I think there's a major flaw with Climate Change.

According to David Suzuki and his life partner Al Gore, the release of carbon dioxide emissions into the air causes the Greenhouse Effect. Now, that's not where the flaw is-the flaw is that they say that this will somehow bring about the destruction and death of the earth. Am I missing something rather large here? Is it just me, or does that not make any sense? How will the world end if the earth gets a few degrees warmer? I don't see the reason in this. Even if the ice caps did melt and flood major cities and such, there would still be no severe problems that would destroy the earth. Come to think of it, conditions for life would improve. For example: all those starving kids in Ethiopia? Not starvin' no more because Ethiopia is rich thanks to a massive fishing industry and a beautiful climate that attracts tourism, with its enemy Eritrea being totally flooded, ending the wars between the two countries.

But this is not the only problem with Climate Change. Another major flaw in reasoning is that humans are the cause of it. According to Al Gore, Suzuki and other people who claim to be scientists but actually know nothing of the world around them, that rather large ball of burning Hydrogen and Helium-the one eight light minutes away-has nothing to do with the earth's temperature. I suppose I can see that-the reasoning for the Global Warmians being that the sun only effects the earth's temperature slightly. Or at least I would be able to see that if it weren't for the fact that for the past 4.5 billion years the global temperature has been going hand-in-hand with the sun's activity. If you look at a graph of the sun's activity since 1900 and the earth's temperature? Big surprise: the two graphs practically mirror each other. Interestingly enough, for about as long as the Global Warmists have been babbling nonsensically, the sun's activity has been unusually high. Sunspots and solar flares and such were very common-when the sun was warmer, the earth was warmer. But now the activity of the sun is starting to go down. So is the warmists' argument. In most of Israel it was snowing for several days straight just a month or so ago, while Tehran is facing record cold temperatures. Does this not seem odd to you? But if you're still not convinced, how about we go to Eastern Canada, where most of the global warming bulls**t came from. For the past several weeks it has been colder than it has been in many years, with thick ice and snow covering the landscape. Seems mighty odd for a planet that's doomed by warming, don't it? A little while ago people were worried about the ice shelf to the north of Canada-the Liberal Warmists were complaining that if we didn't cut back on greenhouse gas emissions, the ice would disappear entirely. Now they ignore it-and why? Because the ice shelf is a lot thicker now. Huge glaciers of ice are reconnecting there, and they don't want you to know it, because they know that it would damage their argument. Think about it, folks.

My views on space travel

In the 1960's, there was a massive anti-space program movement that was under the ridiculous and probably pot-induced belief that the space program would destroy the world or something to that effect. Hippies were afraid of something bad happening because of the space program is my point-they wanted us to stay on the earth and away from the moon. Nowadays we're having a similar problem about going to Mars-apparently it is a bad idea.

In my opinion, this is stupid. What do these people want us to do, stay far back in the cave, watching and fearing the big ball of fire in the sky while we wonder what those shadows leaking in to the edge of the tunnel are? Obviously, that is what they want-these people are highly detrimental to human society: they are too afraid. These Liberal pinko weirdos want us to remain on earth, forever fearing what lays beyond our atmosphere. What does this result in? We might not notice the effects for some time but, eventually, we will get considerably more docile and timid, because eventually we're going to run outta wars on earth. Don't get me wrong, runnin' outta wars on earth is a good thing in some ways, but once we solve all of our problems and immerse ourselves in docility, we'll be too bloody timid to ever leave this planet. What happens then? Here's your answer: we gobble up all the resources in a few hundred years, and then we begin starving. Our planet begins to starve and our species begins to die out because some jackass in the 21st century said that going to space was a bad idea. We take everything that earth can give and we can't replenish it or our dying species because we were too cowardly to go into space and by now, when we really need to go into space, we can't because we've forgotten what to do. I figure that if we're not colonizing Mars by 2700, we'll be doomed.

But there's another problem I've got. My rant ain't over yet. It's the people they're sending into space-they're sending indecisive kids with a leadership problem. More and more NASA is refusing to send disciplined, tough and probably hard-drinking sons of bitches into space and are instead putting nice, weak and just generally girlish people into orbit. Let's say we go to Mars-we'll be sending kids and average Joes over to a planet on a year-round trip. People who have no discipline and are only chosen for their smarts are sent to a hostile climate in cramped quarters with people that they will eventually get tired of. For all we know, they won't even reach Mars because they'll be busy ringing each others' necks after spending six months with someone who has bad BO. So who should we send? The Navy! The USMC! Those guys, especially the navy, have discipline, can and have in the past lived in cramped conditions for years at a time when they were on ships or in submarines. The USMC? Hell, even the infantry would do good because they train these people to spend months in bunkers-tight, concrete-made bunkers with a sergeant they don't like, a corporal that just plain annoys them, and a private who might be going insane. They're used to these conditions and they would do fine in space. Think about it, folks.