Well folks, I've been sitting on the fence about a blog on that war in South Ossetia and the Beijing Olympics, and since people seem to care more about some schmuck from Germany getting a gold medal than about some poor kid bombed by MiGs, I decided on the latter.
I was watching a program recently, and it was about the effect of the Olympics on the Chinese population. I gotta tell you, from what I can see, it's just about the worst atrocity committed on the Chinese people since those commie SOBs took power. (At least, the worst one that gets reported to the West). People were forced from their homes so they could build sections of the Olympic stadiums and ceremonial sites and so on that were needed. Civilians were basically told "get out of here or go to prison," were tossed out on the street, and were incapable of complaining to anybody about it because, guess what? In China, you've got no rights! If you complain about losing your house so some guy from the other side of the planet can run for a hundred meters or so, you go to jail! Individuals don't own their homes, the state does, so they get booted out of them for the enjoyment of people everywhere from Canada to Australia (going east, that is).
China has essentially destroyed the Olympics, and here's how. Instead of having real fireworks (which you'd think they'd be well-stocked with since they invented the damn things), they make ones using a computer-those aren't fireworks you're watching, they're binary code made into colorful shapes. And for the kid who sang that stupid little song for the opening ceremony, they made her lip synch, because the kid who actually sang it wasn't cute enough for the part. In essence, the Beijing Olympics is just like everything else made in China: fake and useless.
Now, of the few people who are capable of a tiny amount of independent thought and actually realize what horrible acts are being committed by the Communists on the Chinese, only a few of them realize what should receive blame for what. Liberals in the West will find any imaginable way to desecrate the only working governmental system known-capitalism-and this case is no exception. Instead of getting angry at those repulsive Communist Chinese, they do their best to find reasons to be pissed-off at capitalists. For example, outrage is thrown at McDonald's for advertising the Olympics and using it to get money. But that's not right. All McDonald's is doing is getting profits-there's nothing wrong with that; they need those profits to keep their corporation going. What's wrong with keeping yourself well-fed? The answer is nothing: that's what capitalists do and that's how capitalist countries keep on working long after all other countries fall apart. Think about it, folks.
Thursday, August 14, 2008
Sunday, August 3, 2008
Screw-up
Folks, as many of you know, I spend a lot of time on the computer. A LOT of time on the computer. Now, while this may someday result in me having a very large gut and a lonely death by heart attack, for the moment it is working to my advantage. For example, it has allowed me to make these blogs with a certain degree of credibility. As you'll read in this article:
http://www.wtopnews.com/index.php?nid=105&sid=1448629
a Canadian soldier recently killed two children in an Afghani car. The vehicle was driving at high speeds next to his convoy and the driver drove it as if it were going to attack the Canuck soldiers. So, the Canadian opens fire on the vehicle, killing a two-year-old boy and his four-year-old sister, although the driver-their father-was apparently unharmed.
Now, frankly this sounds like a reasonable mistake on the Canadian's part. The driver was driving like an idiot near a military convoy-not a good idea-and the soldier, who had more than likely seen his fair share of Taliban nut-jobs attack convoys with Toyotas, interpreted this as hostile and opened fire. If you ask me, the soldier was just doing his job and, had that actually been a Taliwacker vehicle, he would have saved his own life and the lives of his comrades. Of course, this incident is instantly used as fodder for Liberal and commie scum throughout North America. Immediately after the shooting reached Canadian papers, outrage spreads amongst the anti-war people (despite having the collective intelligence of a single down-syndrome afflicted slug, Liberals are still technically people). Many folks throughout the net, on Youtube, blogging sites, and so on voice their opinions on the matter. Ones that are capable of independent thought understood that it was a simple fuck-up and that no one (except possibly the father, for driving like an idiot) should be blamed.
But, as for those who just think "what would Michael Moore do?" They instantly say that the Canadian soldier is a sick, baby-eating monster and that he should be punished severely. Which is odd, since nobody acts out when this happens. For those of you that didn't follow the link I just gave, what I said was that nobody acts out when innocent children are killed intentionally by the terrorists. I can understand shooting a car driving like that at your convoy in a warzone, but I do not tolerate Taliban sons of bitches blowing themselves up in schools. Strangely enough, liberal dirtbags do tolerate that, because, after all, we invaded Afghanistan and are trying to rebuild it. That gives the enemy the right to murder civilians intentionally, right? WRONG. Any psychotic commie freak that thinks that should get their head checked out.
The fact of the matter is that our soldiers only kill kids by accident. Our enemy kills them intentionally because they use the murdering of children to get them power-they claim that the attacks will stop if we leave. So, who is worse? The people who don't mean to kill children and are here to help a destroyed country, or the people that go around blowing schools and the kids inside and are doing it so they can take control of the country again? Think about it, folks.
http://www.wtopnews.com/index.php?nid=105&sid=1448629
a Canadian soldier recently killed two children in an Afghani car. The vehicle was driving at high speeds next to his convoy and the driver drove it as if it were going to attack the Canuck soldiers. So, the Canadian opens fire on the vehicle, killing a two-year-old boy and his four-year-old sister, although the driver-their father-was apparently unharmed.
Now, frankly this sounds like a reasonable mistake on the Canadian's part. The driver was driving like an idiot near a military convoy-not a good idea-and the soldier, who had more than likely seen his fair share of Taliban nut-jobs attack convoys with Toyotas, interpreted this as hostile and opened fire. If you ask me, the soldier was just doing his job and, had that actually been a Taliwacker vehicle, he would have saved his own life and the lives of his comrades. Of course, this incident is instantly used as fodder for Liberal and commie scum throughout North America. Immediately after the shooting reached Canadian papers, outrage spreads amongst the anti-war people (despite having the collective intelligence of a single down-syndrome afflicted slug, Liberals are still technically people). Many folks throughout the net, on Youtube, blogging sites, and so on voice their opinions on the matter. Ones that are capable of independent thought understood that it was a simple fuck-up and that no one (except possibly the father, for driving like an idiot) should be blamed.
But, as for those who just think "what would Michael Moore do?" They instantly say that the Canadian soldier is a sick, baby-eating monster and that he should be punished severely. Which is odd, since nobody acts out when this happens. For those of you that didn't follow the link I just gave, what I said was that nobody acts out when innocent children are killed intentionally by the terrorists. I can understand shooting a car driving like that at your convoy in a warzone, but I do not tolerate Taliban sons of bitches blowing themselves up in schools. Strangely enough, liberal dirtbags do tolerate that, because, after all, we invaded Afghanistan and are trying to rebuild it. That gives the enemy the right to murder civilians intentionally, right? WRONG. Any psychotic commie freak that thinks that should get their head checked out.
The fact of the matter is that our soldiers only kill kids by accident. Our enemy kills them intentionally because they use the murdering of children to get them power-they claim that the attacks will stop if we leave. So, who is worse? The people who don't mean to kill children and are here to help a destroyed country, or the people that go around blowing schools and the kids inside and are doing it so they can take control of the country again? Think about it, folks.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
